Attitudes toward money

Piety brought her social advantages in the form of active participation in the community as a member of a church?

Attitudes toward money

New Attitudes Toward Wealth Social Darwinism fueled the popularity of "Friendly visitors" in the field of social work. These upper class women believed it was their Christian duty to help the poor by providing positive moral role models.

Attitudes toward money everybody was getting rich. The new wealthy class, although more prominent, larger, and richer than any class in American history, was still rather small.

People soon began to ask fundamental questions. How did one get rich in America? Was it because of a combination of hard work and intelligence? Was it because of inheritance? Did education and skill play a role?

Or was it simply luck? Old attitudes about the importance of inheritance were still prevalent, but new ideas also emerged. Church leaders condemned him as a heretic, and ordinary people everywhere cringed at the idea that humans may have evolved from apes.

These Social Darwinists, led by Herbert Spencer and William Graham Sumner, believed that the humans who were the most fit became the most successful.

Whatever people had the necessary skills to prosper — perhaps talent, Attitudes toward money, or hard work — would be the ones who would rise to the top.

Why were some people poor? To the Social Darwinist, the answer was obvious. They simply did not have the required skills. Darwin stated that the weaker members of a species in nature would die and that over time only the stronger genes would be passed on.

Social Darwinists believed the same should happen with humans. They opposed government handouts, or safety regulations, or laws restricting child labor.

Such actions would coddle the weak, and the unfit would be allowed to survive. Andrew Carnegie and John Rockefeller both agreed that the most successful people were the ones with the necessary skills.

Attitudes toward money

But they each believed that God played a role in deciding who got the skills. Because God granted a select few with the talent to be successful, Christian virtue demanded that some of that money be shared. This is where the difference lies between the hardcore Social Darwinist and the proponent of the Gospel of Wealth.

Carnegie and Rockefeller became philanthropists — wealthy citizens who donated large sums of money for the public good. Many of these books were written as an example to young boys, teaching that the virtues of hard work would eventually pay off.

Although he penned many stories, each book answered the question of how to get rich in America. Alger believed that a combination of hard work and good fortune — pluck and luck, in his words — was the key. A typical Alger story would revolve around a hardworking immigrant who served on the bottom rung of the corporate ladder, perhaps as a stock boy.

One day he would be walking down the street and see a safe falling from a tall building. Our hero would bravely push aside the hapless young woman walking below and save her life. The two would get married, and he would become vice-president of the corporation. This is what the masses wished to believe.

Success would not come to a select few based on nature or divine intervention. Anyone who worked hard could make it in America if they caught a lucky break.


This idea is the basis for the "American Dream. There simply is no answer. Thousands of Americans have found this idyllic path, but as many or more have not.Changing attitudes toward work help explain the changing demographic profile of the American work force.

With a college degree increasingly seen as a necessity for the good life, many young people ages 16 to 24 report they are staying out of the labor force to concentrate full time on their. by Elaine Fortin Type Papers and Articles: OSV Research Paper This paper will deal with the attitudes of the early nineteenth century toward women and their roles.

White Over Black: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, (A Pelican Book) [Winthrop D. Jordan] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Written in during a time of race riots and cilvil rights, covers the history of slavery, segregation. Jerusalem Letter / Viewpoints. VP 3 Elul / 15 August WARTIME AND POSTWAR DUTCH ATTITUDES TOWARD THE JEWS: MYTH AND TRUTH Manfred Gerstenfeld.

Coefficient alpha was calculated using scores for the single testing, and was for the total questionnaire (80 questions), for the Self scale, and for the Other scale. China has had a fitful relationship with homosexuality, but attitudes are slowly changing, especially in the big cities.

"Wartime and Postwar Dutch Attitudes Toward the Jews: Myth and Truth" by Manfred Gerstenfeld