Emig writing as a mode of learning summary

I thought I had finally found proof of what my parents thought was a very poor way of studying when I was in high school. I used to read my Social Study, Biology, or Literature books, synthesize, analyze, create diagrams, and in the process I would managed to re-write 3 pages of material into a page product. My dad thought I was nuts! Of course now I realize that my dad was right, and that had I not learned other ways of studying, I would not be in a graduate program never mind in this class… can you imagine re-writing all these readings!?!?!?!?

Emig writing as a mode of learning summary

Writing as a mode of learning by Janet Emig: In this article Emig tries to show how writing serves as a unique way of learning. To summarize her thesis, Emig feels that writing promotes learning uniquely because writing as a product and as a process has many attributes that correspond uniquely to certain important learning strategies.

Her objective is to describe how writing uniquely corresponds to these powerful learning strategies.

The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents Volume 1 But five centuries passed without result, and we cannot properly call them pioneers of American civilization. Columbus it was, who unlocked the eastern door of the new world.
Buceta loca de tesao video caseiro - MecVideos Standing at the crossroads of five languages and a matching number of literary traditions English, French, German, Italian, and Russianhe experienced translation on a level inaccessible to the majority of his predecessors, presaging and influencing our modern understanding of the indispensability of linguistic and cultural interconnection. To address this omission, Drs.

In order to achieve her purpose, Emig focuses most of her article on the comparison and contrast of writing and talking as a medium of learning. Although she focuses mainly on writing and talking, she also touches on a few other topics in less detail.

She makes distinctions between writing and all other verbal language processes, writing and other forms of composing, and finally composition of writing in the two other major graphic symbol systems including mathematical equations and scientific formulas.

She thinks that writing is not merely valuable or special but unique. She spends time in her paper discussing how writing itself is a unique process. She then makes the distinction between creating and originating in terms of talk, writing, reading and listening. Writing in her opinion unlike the others is originating and creating verbal construct that is graphically recorded.

Her final point about the uniqueness of writing is that she feels that speech and writing are not at all interchangeable. She feels that they serve separate and distinct functions and that many people do not realize this.

In the next section of her paper she defines the many differences between writing and talking. Then she goes on to talk about different definitions of learning.

"+_.D(e)+"

She starts out by using chemo-physiological definition of learning and then honing in on a more philosophical definition by John Dewey and Jean Piaget. I think her point in this was to show that the definition of learning can mean different things to different people depending on the context in which it is being discussed.

Emig uses these terms to tie together some consensus between these definitions to show what they all have in common. The next part of the paper in my opinion was the most interesting. It focused a bit on the more scientific aspect and how the brain works when you are writing.

emig writing as a mode of learning summary

Emig goes on to discuss the relationship between writing and both hemispheres of the brain as well as some of the contributions of the right hemisphere in learning. She discusses the idea that the writing process gives you immediate feedback and that feedback includes past, present, and future.

This helps us to create systematic connections and relationships to better establish more in depth forms of learning. The final thing that Emig discusses in her article is the temporal aspect of writing.

Emig feels that the temporal aspect of writing relates perfectly with our learning process because both of these processes are slow. This helps us better to synthesize information. It is very insightful on the basis of comparing and contrasting talk and writing because it shows how these ideas are complimentary learning strategies and can help you get the most out of the information being learned.

This article also does a great job of adding philosophical insight on the benefits of writing and learning. Before I read the article I thought it was going to show me a more scientific side to why writing promotes learning.Gmail is email that's intuitive, efficient, and useful. 15 GB of storage, less spam, and mobile access.

The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents Volume 1

Emig citations, "the left and right hempisheres of the brain work in relation to the writing processes," and that Emig made connnections "between the hand, the eye, and the brain, and studies are being done to show that writing is not simply a visible product, but a mode of learning - a way we understand" (26).

Title: Writing as a Mode of Learning Created Date: Z. Writi~gas a mode of Learning JANET EMIG WRITINGrepresents a unique mode of leanling-not merely valuable, not mere- ly special, but unique. That will be my contention in this paper. The thesis is.

emig writing as a mode of learning summary

The Synthesis of Fictional and Factional in Literature and Art. The 7th International Conference at the University of Kazan University of Kazan, Russia, May Watch Buceta loca de tesao video caseiro - free porn video on MecVideos.

initiativeblog.com: Sitemap